Posted by : David Guyll May 29, 2012

By now you have already downloaded the D&D Next playtest files, browsed through them, and probably even ran the adventure. For those curious as to how the playtest arrived in its initial state, this Legend & Lore article provides a behind-the-scenes glance, including some ideas on making the game more "old-school" or to try out things that they might implement later (like giving the fighter a second theme). There is also some clarification on things that at an initial glance might seem like an error, like why the damage die on for the dwarves' weapons are higher than normal.

I have not had a chance to run Caves of Chaos--which I plan on doing "by the book", such as it is--but my group is already working on a few houserules and some homebrew content for when I start running a converted Age of Worms campaign:
  • Advantage/Disadvantage: Given that the math behind advantage and disadvantage is something like +4 and -3, I am going to change each instance to a +/-1. I might boost it to +/-2. I would also allow players to swap it out for a damage bonus instead, just to see what they do. The reason for this is that I think that multiple advantages and disadvantages should have a greater effect instead of a binary on/off.
  • Equipment Costs: Overall I am changing costs largely to silver pieces and fiddling with them from there on out. I have no issue with adventurers coming back from dungeon crawls with "only" a crap-ton of silver instead of gold.
  • Minor Actions: Spells and abilities that read "you can do this and still attack etc", like healing word, are just going to be categorized as Minor or Free actions. Less repetitive verbiage.
  • Delay: You can delay your turn, which basically just reduces your Initiative count.
  • Resistance/Vulnerabilities: Subtracts or adds a set value instead of halving or doubling it. Basically how 4th Edition handled it.
  • Masterwork Weapons/Armor: There are scaling categories for masterwork items, making crafting skills and non-magical things more useful at later levels. Basically you can tack on attack and damage bonuses, as well as qualities like High Crit and Brutal from 4th Edition. Armor would get damage resistance, AC bonuses, etc. Some of these things might require special materials.
  • Weapon/Armor Materials: Adamantine and mithril are not individual armors, but materials that armor can be made of. Currently adamantine grants damage resistance while mithril alleviates speed and skill penalties. Also adding in darkwood, dragon hide (for energy resistances), Baatorian green steel, etc.
  • High Elf: Bonus against Charm effects instead of complete immunity. I think elves should have an edge, but not be able to ignore powerful fey that compel them (was not geas a charm-effect?).
  • Hill Dwarf: Poison resistance instead of immunity. As assassin should still be able to poison a dwarf.
  • Cleric Spells: This is almost exactly as I want it, save that clerics will have spell lists based on god or domain instead of having to set them. I might even make it more like a wizard, where they can learn new prayers.
  • Herbalism: You cannot make healing potions. Instead you can spend an amount of sp to make a healing balm, which causes Hit Dice used during a short rest to restore an additional 3 hit points. Healing potions are magic items and I do not like the idea of someone with no magical aptitude being able to craft them. Plus it makes the feat more useful in low- no-magic campaigns like Dark Sun.
  • Wizards: Still working on a spellcasting model that I like, but preparing spells is likely going away entirely. Just not sure if I want to do a recharging model, energy-gathering model, or a combination of both. Basically I want to not resort to a spell-point model unless I have to.
  • Potion of Strength: Grants a bonus to Strength checks, melee attacks, and damage rolls. This makes it useful to everyone.
  • Ray of Frost: Deals some cold damage and slows (half speed) instead of just dropping speed to 0. As is, it is too good against flying critters and it makes no sense that it can completely immobilize you, but you can still attack, and there is no physical trauma involved.
  • Non-Ability Scores: Skeletons and zombies will still have an Intelligence score, albeit 1. 
  • Save-or-Dies: Going to go with scaling severity, here. As in, characters with x hit points suffer less severe penalties from attacks. So a medusa's gaze might slow then petrify a target who fails to Constitution saves, while a creature with 10 or less hit points, or who is bloodied, might be petrified instantly. 

We have also cobbled together a bladesinger class (since I decided that a theme would not deliver enough, quickly enough to make it playable from the start), tieflings, changlings, and Wild Talent theme using existing things as a basis.

{ 4 comments... read them below or Comment }

  1. Wow, that's awesome. I love that people are hacking the game. I hope the modular approach makes that easy to do.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I quite like the advantage/disadvantage model, it is simple an effective. You either have it or you don't.

    My major concern with your proposed amendment is players will bog play down trying to eek out as many small advantages as possible.

    ReplyDelete
  3. @Mearls: Having gone through two editions with lots of regularly scaling things, one of the hard parts has been trying to port over stuff while resisting the urge to give them big numbers; I kept doing a double-take at the Dark Cultists' "only" +4 to melee attacks.

    The other hard part is coming up with racial features that seem thematic, interesting, and/or balanced with the narrow, low-level glimpse that we have.

    @Phaezen: I agree that it is simple, and given that this is a playtest I am going to wait and see how my group handles it tomorrow. The math "bonus" from advantage was said to be something like +4, so I think that players are going to always try fishing for that, too.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yay, non-Vancian wizard! To me, spells that disappear from memory would work better for a cleric than a wizard (and even better for a warlock, whose powers are granted by a more mysterious and creepy entity and must be restored constantly). The way cleric spells work in the playtest is how I'm going to run wizards. But something more innovative would be interesting to see too.

    ReplyDelete

Followers

Recent Comments

bloggerbloggerRecent Comments Widget

Popular Post

Blog Archive

- Copyright © Points of Light -Metrominimalist- Powered by Blogger - Designed by Johanes Djogan -