WokeC Panders to Their Fellow Attention-Starved Sex-Pests

Really quick: if you want something similar to Dungeons & Dragons, but which focuses on fun, usability, and quality—yet isn't grossly overpriced—as opposed to social justice progressive politics, propaganda, and irrational, obsessive hatred over mere disagreements and arbitrary thought crime violations, check out Dungeons & Delvers.

Here's the shot:

And you can go here to check out various, heh, "chasers", but here are some highlights:

You got that? Not liking terrible art where a satyr is badly posing as if he knows he's being drawn, smiling for no discernible reason, and blasting nothing in particular with what I assume is color spray somehow makes you an istaphobe.

Is that an inherent ability for WokeC-era satyrs? Is he supposed to be a wizard? I ask because I think that's wand dangling from nothing in particular. At least I hope it is.

Actually, wait a sec...



What do you think he's wearing? Where's that strap going? You know what, I'll just be glad that there aren't any mastectomy scars, and instead check out Jon "everyone that doesn't like everything I like is an istaphobe" Holmes's bio...

I'm surprised. Not that he's a pronouner—that's to be expected—but at how restrained and succinct it is. No mention of supporting terrorists or the alphabet people, and his avatar isn't a picture of him muzzled.

Here's another:


First off, anyone that actually plays D&D can tell you that prismatic spray would have more colors.

Second, I agree that if you ignore the composition in general, pose, the complete lack of anything resembling adventuring gear, and that very suspicious "belt" and "wand", then yeah, no "prblem" at all. It's not like WokeC has any other satyr art they could have used.

Like, I dunno, this:


Oh look, something that remotely resembles an adventurer, as opposed to cliche woke trash shooting off his not-quite-rainbow wad at nothing in particular.

I'm honestly surprised they used a white red head at all, as opposed to taking a previous bit of satyr art (like the one above) and having the artist (or, more likely, a Tumblr-tier diversity hire) redo it, but making her black. No scars or race-swapping right out of the gate? Maybe this year won't be so bad after all.


Now this is more what I was expecting. Not only a pronouner, but a "satyr/faun enthusiast" that "likes fantasy smut". Given that satyrs are largely sex-obsessed rapists that were also depicting fucking animals, I'd say that for her and the rest of the sex-pests it's very much, as she says, "on brand".

Especially for this guy:

Here was his particular "contribution" to the thread:

The lady doth project too much, methinks, and I'm very sure all the "grown men" (because surely no women are objecting to the trash art) are affected in any way by, of all things, a sex-starved, furry pronouner's opinions.

But this is WokeC's core audience: mentally ill, childless weirdo losers who are perfectly content to buy anything and everything with a D&D logo on it (while often whining about capitalism), watch grifters pretend to play, all so they can feel like they belong somewhere, like they're part of something.

And for a company without any creativity or passion it's the perfect demographic, because they can save time and money exploiting untalented diversity hacks and nobodies suffering from the delusion that they'll be successful and happy working for a "big company", that people will care that they have their name in a book that people only bought because of the logo, and won't use anyway.

It's also safer, because they can use their cheap diversity hires as a shield. To dismiss all the "haters" as just gatekeeping istaphobes who hate women, gays, and black people, even if you are one or more of those. They've got the whole invented "internalized this-or-that" rhetoric to dismiss the voices of any and everyone that they purport to care about, anytime they dare to dissent.

Unsurprising, given that SJWs only care about themselves.

The upside is that there are vastly superior alternatives, made by people that actually play games, and I think we're also hitting a point where you're going to be able to tell who all the actual sexists, racists, and sexual predators are based entirely on whether they play 5th Edition.





2 comments:

  1. >be you when you made this post
    >sees a creature from an ancient mythology that had a goddess of rainbows casting what was probably prismatic spray
    >call it woke
    >get mad at furries for existing despite them not hurting anyone
    >get mad at the existence of pronouns despite them literally being some of the most common words
    >probably doesn't know singular they is older than singular you and that you is also a pronoun
    >doesn't realize saying I, you, or we would technically also make you "a pronouner"
    >sees what is obviously the right leg and declares it a "Wand" [quotation marks and all]
    >acts as though Hat Wolf's argument was defeated despite them not even addressing the main point
    >doesn't try to become a better person like i did when i was once like them
    >refuses to elaborate
    >leaves

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. >be green cheese when he made the above comment
      >sees a post from like half a year ago and took him this long to think of what to say
      >gets mad that an actual gamer doesn’t like his particular brand of vapidware trash elf-game
      >treats D&D as a lifestyle so thinks that greek gods cast spells from the Player’s Handbook and actually uses it to try and make something he considers to be a point
      >gets mad that a normal person doesn’t like degeneracy even though it's not hurting anyone
      >resorts to setting up a strawmanlette because he is too retarded to understand basic grammar, history, or what a pronouner even is
      >is so retarded that he reads text commenting on a wand and thinks it was referring to a leg
      >sees a pronouning furry declare that normal people are triggered for merely not liking trash art and considers that an argument
      >thinks he is better than anyone even though he sides with furries
      >unable to elaborate
      >leaves an anonymous comment on a half-year old blog post so he can go pretend to his fellow loser associates that he has done something meaningful with is life

      Delete

Powered by Blogger.